0
b2plane
364d

// Religion

"This life is intelligently designed"

Lemme critically analyze and explain why this life is fucking dumb as shit, whether it was designed by an intelligent Celestial Being (God) or not, the design is fucking STUPID

⚠️ 1. SLEEPING

Why do we have to waste 1/3 of our already very short lives on sleeping? That doesnt make any fucking sense. Sleeping is a waste of time. So many things could have been done if sleeping didnt exist.

✅ How i would solve this problem:
- not require any fucking sleep and still able to function perfectly fine.

⚠️ 2. EATING

Why? Who gives a shit? Why do i have to eat to live? How about not waste time on that shit and just live anyways?

✅ How i would solve this problem:
- not require to fucking eat and still function perfectly fine.

⚠️ 3. DRINKING

No one gives a shit. Why do i have to drink to live. What if i cant find water to drink. Its stupid

✅ How i would solve this problem:
- not having to be forced to drink water and still able to live fine.

⚠️ 4. SHITTING

Its fucking stupid and disgusting. Why do i have to shit through my asshole after eating? I just shit out everything i fought for to eat! Thats ridiculous and STUPID DESIGN.

✅ How i would solve this problem:
- embed toxic chemicals within the organism so the food that was eaten gets dissolved by ACID ☣️ within stomach. Same way how snakes have acid, they never shit, snakes just swallow and acid eats up whatever they ate. This same bullshit can be applied for pissing so I'll skip stupid design issue #5.

Comments
  • 7
    as much as i enjoy your rant against religion: get your facts straight.

    snakes DO poop.

    acid doesn't work by "magically removing things"; but by corroding things. meaning: the same stuff is still there, just in a different molecular combination.

    and by the way: the food we eat _gets_ dissolved by acid in our stomachs. that's how digestion works.

    and that's why we sleep, by the way: imagine you having _more_ than two thirds of your time to be dumb....
  • 5
    Your "solutions" are not solutions to any of thr Problems. You didn't provide a new design that solves the problem, you just stated your desired outcome.

    You're just like a client saying "I don't want to be online to log into my website, solutions, make login work pefectly fine without internet"... Except that's now how things work
  • 2
    @Hazarth to be fair, if you believe in god and intelligent design, this really IS how things work.
  • 0
    @tosensei jeff dahmer used a whole bucket of acid to dissolve the entire human body so there's not even a corpse left wth are u saying ofc its possible to create a system that vanishes the entire object out of thin air

    Same way how submarine implosion turns you into atoms. Thats the system id create for food to happen within ur organism so you dont have to shit at all
  • 0
    @Hazarth submarine implosion turns you into atoms. Back to square 1, particles.

    Why cant the same shit happen to food in our stomach? In that case you wouldnt need to have an asshole to shit. Problem solved. And if i was God i could create that system and it would work because i can do anything
  • 3
    On November 23rd, 2023, @b2plane said: "shitting, it’s fucking stupid and disgusting". This will certainly go down in history as an important turning point and will find many devranters baffled as they were convinced b2plane took the utmost delight in shitting, admiring, smelling l and contemplating his shit before having to force it down the pipe with a plunger 🪠
  • 2
    Let's say an intelligent being were in charge of designing a software artifact that finds the shortest path that leaves your house, gets to a pizza place, a bar and a stadium in no particular order, and then goes back to your home.

    However, according to your criteria, in order for the designed software artifact to be "not fucking stupid", it must:
    1) Have absolutely no NOP instructions after compiling, because those are just some "stupid waste of time".
    2) Have no memory footprint because it simply does not requires it.
    3) Not be forced to require CPU time and still run super fast.
    4) Need no garbage collector because that's just dumb and disgusting.

    How this problem could be solved:
    Require absolutely no computing resources by sheer force of will and make P=NP because I said so. Done.
  • 1
    Like all software, the best quality one is the one that was never written. No bugs, no issues, nothing to fix.
  • 4
    @b2plane please, read a science book, once in your life, before you turn on any device capable of electronic communication ever again, because it seems you're as fact-resistant as religiots themselves.
  • 0
    @JsonBoa ur comparing humans with computers, implying we're supposed to work like robots with no thoughts or free will. You just implied religion is false because it contradicts to religions belief where you do have free will. And now you further proved my point. If im the creator of the ENTIRE UNIVERSE who can do whatever i want, i could make a system to make it work irrelevant of your current understanding of it. I could create a system that does not exist in our current reality. If you open your mind wide and jump deeper in this rabbit hole you'll realize that i have a point
  • 1
    @b2plane risking inviting your version of a fatwa, "almighty-based" religions have low self-esteem.

    You can have both free will and design. It's called "evolution of fenotype, genotype and behaviour, by the means of random mutation, natural selection, crossing and learning".
    And besides, extending in @tosensei 's answer, one of the core tenets of computer science is that computational problems are an inherent part of euclidean math and Cartesian views of the world, thus the exact implementation of it's computing capabilities, be it silicon-based or some odd carbon-hydrogen neuron, is just a quirk. You are a meat based computer that can both reprogram itself and be limited by some buggy code or hardware.

    And yet we are aware that our math is incomplete and cannot explain the entirety of the universe. Just because there is more out there that we can understand it does not invalidates our understanding, and just because we understand a lot does not mean that there is nothing more to it
  • 1
    @b2plane dude, Implosion doesn't "turn you into atoms" and acid doesn't just erase things.

    First of all, Implosion requires outside pressure to compress the object suddenly. The more pressure the more it can "crumble" the object. It doesn't turn into atoms, in fact in most cases you end up with a wreck of metal that still takes quite a lot of space... In case of subs It's the outside water that create the pressure, in under-pressure rnvironments it can be the outside pressure, but the inside Pressure needs to be extremely close to vacuum for that even to happen... Not to mention it has to be sudden and and there can be no way for the pressure to equalize, otherwise you get less of an effect or nothing... It's all quite delicate physics.

    On the topic of acid, acid only destroyd bonds between atoms by aggressively wanting or donating electrons, which makes a lot of elements bind to the acid instead of themselves, but you end up with a sludge, it doesn't remove atoms from existance
  • 1
    It's quite bold of you to just Claim something with such confidence when you don't have the least amount if idea how things work.

    Just remember that in physics you can't lose energy, energy needs to be always conserved. You can't create not destroy energy. Which means you can't create nor destroy matter, because matter *is* energy.

    And that's *just* the physics... Don't even get me started on how you didn't consider how biology works at all. You think we sleep, eat and shit just for fun? It's all part of a catefully evolved (or designed of you want) balance of actions and reactions that keeps everything in your Body ticking
  • 1
    Not saying that better design isnt possible. What we got is "good enough", not "perfect". But realistically every design change will probably come with It's own drawbacks and benefits and there's very likely no "one size fits all" solutions for biological beings
  • 0
    @Hazarth agree but I wouldn’t call it design because it’s misleading. Our best theory about biological beings is the evolution theory and according to it, it’s not a design but the result of evolution. Evolution has no specific goal and no direction. It just produces beings that are fit enough to survive.
    The weird looking designs can be explained in a very simple way: They are not designs.
  • 1
    @Lensflare Yep, we're absolutely on the same page. Im just trying to speak OPs "language" since the point I wanted to get across wasnt about evolution in this case and wasnt all that important what OP believes, more just about how it works physically
Add Comment