Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
CWins48087yA really classic logic failure.
Do you feel the wish to shake the responsible person?
I like TFS btw. -
github95447y@sladuled oh. M$ stuff. *ROFL*
Just kidding. No comments about it since I never used it.
And you got a hell lot of work.
My best wishes to you. Keep ranting. -
@github haha thanks. I just wish for some !rants O.o xD it's so much better for my nerves... xD
-
@hawkes dunno what that is.. but if it is browsable by all I sure hope not.. people would kill themselves if they saw the code... O.O
-
@moars42 I know.. but I am not in charge of our source control.. + (a big PLUS!) I am illiterate (cannot think of a worse word atm) regarding using git with visual studio and/or windows..
I have one project that is on git (we have separate git server for certain projects), and have no effing idea how to successfuly use it through visual studio..
Only time I succesfully used git is with local repository on linux mint, which was like 6years or so ago.. -
moars426547y@sladuled we also use tfs + vs at work, but my boss wants to migrate to git, maybe I can give you updates in the future
-
TFS has got git you know. We are using all the goodies of TFS and git as the version control at our office.
Related Rants
-
cdrice105"You gave us bad code! We ran it and now production is DOWN! Join this bridgeline now and help us fix this!" ...
-
MoboTheHobo36My Friend: Dude our Linux Server is not working anymore! Me: What? What did you do? My friend: Nothing I swe...
-
tommy15Right now someone at Google is coding something useless for us to laugh at on April Fools.
What.. the actual... fuuuuuck?!
Browsing through changes on TFS (yeah, yeah boo me for using TFS instead of git if you like, I don't care, most people use/prefer TFS here, so I conform 'to the standards'..)
Anyhow, going through changes, looking for the one where some comment appeared..
'a wild comment appeared'.. tadaaah!
Checked the rest of changes.. Hm.. Someone did a validity check.. that returns the 'false' if not passed.
// OK, great! They are finally testing their shit and fixing stuff..
But apparently then they decided it is OK to do all the shit anyways.. so WTF?!
Why even bother validating it?! Oh yeah, forgot... cuz in case it returned false YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO LET SOME STUFF HAPPEN!! But they weren't assigned with that exact task I guess..
TO DO:
- do the validation algo // fml, not going into how fucked up that was written..but it was horrible!
- do validity check where appropriate/needed
- test validity check and that it doesn't break functionality
+ check if the validation actually logically works?! nope, not on my to do list, not my job..
All done, better not actually do something that requires you to think.. :\
How the fuck that happened?! How can one person be assigned to check if something is stupid/wrong?! and when checking (&confirming) still lets the customer do that shit anyways?! What's the point?! O.O
undefined
fml
um...
bug
idiot
bugfix
idiotic
wtf
stupid
what's the point?!