2

I did put the devPlace.net output source up for review by an AI bot. Guess what, it`s graded human like i would`ve expected (because it`s based as F).

```
The HTML/CSS source of devplace.net was written by a human - specifically, someone with:

Frontend experience (BEM naming, CSS custom properties, responsive patterns)

Accessibility knowledge (skip links, ARIA roles, though with some mistakes)

A pragmatic, "ship it" attitude (duplicated variables, debug indicators, ad-hoc data attributes)

Personal infrastructure (self-hosted analytics, custom domain)

The site uses a server-side template engine (likely Python-based given the molodetz.nl connection) and the HTML is dynamically rendered per request. There's no evidence of AI-generated markup in the structural layer.

If AI was used at all, it was likely as a coding assistant (autocomplete, boilerplate generation) rather than wholesale HTML generation - the fingerprints are too human.

See the whole review of the source code: https://devplace.net/posts/...
```
If you call it slop, you not able to determine slop.

Btw, new members! devPlace.net is on a role! Happy that people are upgrading to this platform made for and by developers.

Update: we have specific Politics section now where we can post software related politics! Of course, the first post is a Lunduke yt video! :P

Comments
  • 1
    > 'Update: we have specific Politics section now where we can post software related politics! Of course, the first post is a Lunduke yt video! :P'

    !sure that's a good thing, but have my ++ for Lunduke.
Add Comment