Privacy Policy done right

Still not gonna read it lmao

So lawyers are not humans? I knew it! 😆

Fun fact: It is possible to write a "human readable" and legally binding privacy policy at the same time.

So, why do we even *need* the one for lawyers? Presumably because the one for humans doesn't provide a complete and unambiguous description of the facts.

If there are two sets of T&Cs then I still need to read them *both*---unless I'm only being asked to accept the version on the left. If I'm accepting *both* boxes by using the service then the human version is no more than, at best, some interpretation notes for the *real* T&Cs on the right.

I remember @Linux did this for his cloud storage service too (OperationTulip, in case anyone is interested). It's nice.

@sbiewald actually, that's what the GDPR demands. Confusing legalese isn't allowed because it only serves for hiding sneaky things.

@RememberMe seems like a bad choice in name

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@Emphiliis

It is not named after that thou :)

@xzvf

Yeah I know about it, but it is not named after that :)

@xzvf

It is a reference to this for example, and other operations:

https://imdb.com/title/tt0663951/

Ofc, Operation (almost any plant) will be associated with some bad thing.

Definitely doing this with my next project!