Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Marks7e3275y@Asbetha thanks. I really enjoy use VS. But I don't like it's native control for git. I prefer to use git bash. I feel git bash brings me more control than vs.
-
C0D4694965y@Marks7e that's what happens when you try to build a GUI for something that's quicker and easier to control and isn't missing everyday features in the cli.
Run commands from the built in terminal instead. -
I'm a GUI guy and I'm glad that VS provided some gui for git, made my life much easier, 2/3clicks and you're done
-
devTea243845y@Marks7e yes VS sucks hard with git terms, fuck them for even trying to change the terms, git bash is just better than the random button naming
-
@devTea which terms did they change? Everything that i know and it's enough for ne is: pull, merge, commit, push
-
devTea243845y@dontbeevil once I was greeted with a message saying check in, is it committed locally or remote? Can’t fund rebase button, sync is fetch? My work requires me to use VS so usually I just have the git bash from git installation floating around
-
@devTea they had to keep some historical names for people that's always been used to version control in VS (TFSVC)
-I think checkin in that case was used like "create a repo"
- you can go in changes menu and commit or stage
- you can go in sync menu and push and pull
- you can go in branches: and creat/delete/merge branches
if you are curious to understand/learn/try more:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/...
tutorials->git
but if you're fine with CLI, I'm not forcing you to do it :)
Related Rants
I love my Thinkpad. ♥️
rant
thinkpad