Meme is a meme!

C++ compares them fine. Just tested:

@highlight

{

int i = 1;

float f = 2.0;

qInfo() << bool(i <= f);

qInfo() << bool(i == f);

qInfo() << bool(i > f);

qInfo() << "";

i = 2;

qInfo() << bool(i <= f);

qInfo() << bool(i == f);

qInfo() << bool(i > f);

qInfo() << "";

i = 3;

qInfo() << bool(i <= f);

qInfo() << bool(i == f);

qInfo() << bool(i > f);

qInfo() << "";

}

@Demolishun really? it's been 5 years since I touched C++ , probably you are right but maybe in the declarative way it doesn't, what about int and string?

@mrtehseen Running code does not lie.

This fails to compile:

@highlight

// i is still 3 here

std::string s("5");

qInfo() << bool(s > i);

There is no reason you couldn't write an operator() to do this though.

Yeah and get 1000 bugs because you assume how launguage handles those shit cases. C has more control.

*laughing in PHP*

I'm surprised people are even debating on this.

Python is a loose scripting language, purposefully throwing away efficiency for conviniences.

C++ is a strict pre-compiled language.

And no, packaging the interpreter into he binary does not count.

Yep utter crap. This is as stupid as hiring a notary and complaining about all the rules that the local loan shark never complained about...

@MPKaboose try making a switch with a case null and case 0 see who is laughing now.