I'm just going to drop this here and run away 🏃

oh boy another one, eh? Just what everybody wanted.

Just never use the equality operator, remember, that all numbers are floats and that the most mathematical implementation of min and max is to have an initial value of -/+ infinity.
We can agree on that most of the implicit type conversations should be errors instead.

JavaScript with all it's flaws is still a quite good language for the occasional client side scripting.

Most of these (highly reposted) things are just a deliberate use of valid mechanics to get weird results.

The only one I find funny is typeof NaN. It makes sense, but still kinda gets me.

@AlgoRythm and it doesn't get better if you don't know how the type coercion system works. The statement (! + [] + [] + ![]) simply equals the string "truefalse" and whaddaya know, the length is 9.

> ! + [] = true
> true + [] == "true"
> "true" + ![] = false
> "true" + false == "truefalse"

Now for all the ones you are -using-... I mean abusing type coercion for, show me a valid use case that you are dumb enough to implement these with.

I'm waiting for the day someone actually uses "(!+[]+[]+[])" and expects a valid response.

Just because a language "can" do something, doesn't mean you as the dev "should" do it.

I mean, in simpler terms....
I "can" drive a car off a cliff into a valley of ass raping gorilla's, doesn't mean I "should"... unless you're into that that?, stop blaming the car.

js will most likely be hated by backend devs who rely more on logic , consistency and stability ..and loved by frontend devs who spend 4 hours deciding the colour of a button.