Was it really necessary to abbreviate “cumulative” like this...? - devRant

Ranter

Comments

1

LotsOfCaffeine

4281

5y

Source: https://medium.com/ml-everything/...
1

LotsOfCaffeine

4281

5y

@rooter I've done quite a lot of C#, so I'm very much used to long and verbose variable/class/method names
6

ltlian

2188

5y

Agree with preferring long explicit names. Often it makes the code so obvious that comments become superfluous.

My only exception is 'button'. It must always be abbreviated to 'butt'.
0

LotsOfCaffeine

4281

5y

@molaram do synonyms count as abbreviations?
3

AlgoRythm

50252

5y

Give me the cum_rewards daddy
0

sariel

8447

5y

numpy cum rewards? Sign me up!
0

MASTER-ELMO

9

5y

Just rename it to jizz_bucket += jizz
2

melezorus34

3336

5y

@rutee07 should review the code.
1

Demolishun

35024

5y

Come again?

LOL, somebody said they prefer long explicit names rather than this short explicit name. So long beats short, age old tale.
0

NoToJavaScript

4638

5y

Absolutely, wouldnt work without it
0

amoux

268

5y

My first thought is never a cumulative sum. And I usually name it as;
cums = torch.cumsum(x)
1

donuts

23672

4y

That's why u use total... So this must be intentional
1

Root

79767

4y

Pine script does this too. 🙄
0

OmerFlame

3841

4y

Laughed so hard my stomach hurts

devRant © 2021 Hexical Labs LLC
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service