Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
![](/static/devrant/img/pipeless-devrant-banner-white.png)
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
My 2c, extensions are too easy to game. Ublock has been a particular target with namealike clones serving malware, and their options are truly limited in terms of how they can defend against hostile requests. In that vein, I prefer what brave does, as it's a little more robust and isn't extension marketplace dependent.
Personally though, I just front my network with a pfsense and handle it as a routing concern. -
akshar23434y@SortOfTested The approach Brave is taking might become the new widespread thing. Mozilla is also trying something, I heard.
Never knew of pfsense though, gotta check it out. Looks like a physical solution similar to piHole, but better. -
endor57584y@SortOfTested considering Brave's track record, I say it's no better than those malware fake blockers. First there was the hidden "whitelisting" of certain google and facebook ads, and now the referral link scandal. I'm sure that if someone with enough knowledge started digging through all their code, they would find a lot more hidden nasty shit.
Firefox + uBlock + uMatrix is the best solution I've seen so far - with a PiHole on top. -
I'm fine with normal ads as long as they don't try to track me as if their existence depends on it
Related Rants
Some blocker like uBlock origin should come pre-installed by now. I mean at least the malicious stuff could get blocked and the online world could be a bit more safe. Legit, not-in-the-face ads are still okay at times, I guess :/
random
web browsers
ublock origin
ads
one last tag for ~seo purposes~
adblock
malware