A completely secure method of transmitting data.

End-to-end encryption isn't enough?

@tild3 lol trusting encryption is such a massive flaw in a secruity mindset

@jonnmmoore your evidence?

@ScribeOfGoD yahoo

@jonnmmoore if you're using that as your evidence then yes, depending what type of encryption you use determines how save your data is. Yahoo used MD5, good luck trying to Crack a 4096bit rsa key though

@ScribeOfGoD sure but at a point in time people thought that about md5. Simply allowing someone to collect your data because its encrypted isnt a good methodology.

@jonnmmoore but even if you design something *absolute* people will still Crack it with enough time. Nothing can be made impenetrable

@ScribeOfGoD oh ye of little faith

@jonnmmoore not at all haha

@fox8091 sounds like a good time

@tild3 Encryption is a joke. You are not even sure you are taking to the desired party

@sgoel01 and the Op's algorithm would solve it? So many dumb people here trying to act smart -_- it's hypothetical. Why the hell are you over thinking it?

@ScribeOfGoD OP has shown intention in trying to solve this problem because he know that it's a major issue. Ability to able to talk secretly at a long distance is a tech to die for. And what about over thinking ? Are not great problems solved by some dumb people trying to over think ? Isn't that how research goes ?

@sgoel01 there are ways to add a signature to a file. It is however needed to have a system that works with private and public keys.
Furthermore, there is a difference between hashes and encryption. Encrypted data can be restored, and hashed data is impossible to reconstruct (in theory...).
Md5 is a hash algorithm but with a high colission rate. I.e.: there are a lot of strings that return the same value. And that's why it is unsave.

Most people here confuses encryption with hashing and KEX etc..

Quantum cryptography