Afraid of CSS? Here’s a snippet of completely valid stylesheet to ease your anxiety:

.container {
break-before: verso;
display: ruby;
mask-border-slice: 0;
overflow-anchor: none;
touch-action: manipulation;
font-variant: historical-forms;
initial-letter: 3.0 2;
}

Thanks, I am now more afraid.

I don't know what any of those rules do.

I only understood “0”.

also show what it does and why it can't be done without these unknown properties.

Break-before: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US...

Display:ruby :
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US... -> Inside Values -> Ruby

Mask-border-slice: used in mask-border, which can create unusual border-styles. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US...

Overflow-anchor:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US...

Touch-mode: manipulation
Used to disable double-tap to zoom.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US...

font-variant:
Actually, something i needed to use, wow. @kiki is a god confirmed yet again.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US... -> values -> historical

Initial-d: has nice songs
Initial-letter: _Did you mean "::first-letter"?_
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US...

@theabbie welp, I got some links and unclear summaries for you. Time to waste your time!

That's a .clean desk you have.

So apparently the reason I've never heard about break-before is that it's essentially unsupported.

Ruby is for text annotations, a cool trick but I can't think of a situation where I would've needed it.

Anchors, touch-mode, font-vatiant are massively important and thanks for the link

initial-letter is redundant at first sight, I wonder if it has any actual features that ::first-letter doesn't or the W3C just felt like putting a bit more stress on browser developers.

@lbfalvy Looking at the compatibility table for initial-letter... It must be a Mac thing to make stuff harder for everybody else.
> :Oh look this website looks funcky.
<: Do you use Mac ?
> No...
< You can only visited our website with a mac or iOS device

@lbfalvy initial-letter is more fucky than funky
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_b...

@lbfalvy Yeah, these might be technically valid properties, but they're completely useless when most of them are so experimental they're barely supported anywhere.

are you crazy too ?

and why can't texas actually be habitable ?
and not another chomo haven

on another note

https://nypost.com/2021/10/...

hooters now looks like chicago. like mostly all of chicago

Jokes on you, I can just tap into the entirety of human knowledge and pull out the answer to any problem ever solved by any human being.

@destroyerofcode solve art then.

@melezorus34 https://www.google.com/search?q=art

I didn't say define, I said solve. @destroyerofcode

@melezorus34 And I said knowledge not intelligence.

@melezorus34 art is the collective rearrangement of information a person has already processed or is viewing which interacts in some cases skillfully with their hands and the mood and inclination that causes them to color the rendition of their combinations with their own inclinations towards the specific things they are rearranging and blending through a usually practiced medium :P

solution is random neural connections firing as a result of longterm developmental processes as well as proneness to error in learned skills and feedback colored by mood and personal history etc effecting minute decisions in finger articulation and choice of prominence of representation colored further by ones bias on the subject material.

in today's world someone might draw the pronouns and themselves with a pair of breasts and a penis with their hands on their heads weeping as the pronouns beat them senseless. or maybe a scene from court of pope francis where the little boys are smiling in their chains

@melezorus34 previously this would have been a scultped naked man with a large penis or a comely woman rising from the sea or a park filled with victorian people with beautiful lifelike waves

@melezorus34 I blame fucks like warwick.

@destroyerofcode you said you could pull out the answer to any problem ever solved, though.

Not afraid but disgusted.