Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API

From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
asgs109323yI hope newbies will understand one day why they get banned or downvoted or get their questions closed
SO or some of its SEs may be toxic but the amount of pollution these people add to the website is too huge to deal with -
@asgs Yeah, being friendly to lazy idiots won't make them better people - it will only attract more lazy idiots.
-
@tosensei Beginners in particular have no business asking anything on SO because the things they can ask have already been answered anyway - what they need to learn is how to use a search engine.
I've been using SO from time to time, and I never even made an account there. That's the intended main use of SO in terms of numbers. -
@tosensei That's the point - there's just about nothing a beginner is even able to ask that doesn't already have an answer. If they follow the rules and do their homework, the question is solved.
There shouldn't be a noob area because SO isn't meant as helpdesk, forum, or community. It's not about the one person asking, it's about the dozens or hundreds persons finding that with a search engine later.
Noobs who can't follow the rules, don't do research, or are outright lazy shouldn't be pandered to, but get banned as quickly as possible. Their egocentrism is prone to destroy the whole project. -
@tosensei That would be pointless. The whole idea of SO is not giving every single noob his own answer, but giving the answer once and in good form, and then relying on people using search engines.
Such a noob forum would have nothing to offer to those who give the skillful answers so that it would be noobs among themselves, which would not be helpful. On top of that, it would pollute the search results with garbage - except if everything were marked as "no follow" for search engines, thereby again defeating the whole purpose of SO.
The SO approach of banning dumb noobs is a lot more helpful - not for these noobs, but for what SO is trying to achieve. SO is not a forum, not a helpdesk, not a community. It should enforce that strictly instead of pandering to lazy idiots who don't contribute anything useful at all. -
Also, if these lazy noobs don't get useful answers in their honeypot forum, as can be expected, they will instead try in the main section anyway. That brings us back to square one, only now in worse form. If you welcome lazy idiots in any way, shape, or form, they will fail to realise what's wrong with them and become even more demanding, plus that welcoming idiots attracts only more of them.
That continues to a point where the skilled members are fed up with providing free work for idiots and leave - thereby killing the project, which would then drown in a sea of incompetence.
1. Go to stackoverflow's homepage
2. Read some of the fine selection of questions that are asked
3. WTF?????
rant
what are docs
please google first
stackoverflow