Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
lotd79228yI wonder if there exists something like a Java preprocessor that supports transpiling to legacy :p
-
I'm confused as to why your tests care about how the functionality is implemented. Can you explain more?
-
@linux-colonel maybe the testing software can't handle features introduced with Java 1.8
-
@Krokoklemme
This is what I'm confused about. I don't understand how you could end up in a situation like that. In process tests would have to run in jre8 to correctly interpret any of the bytecode, regardless of the feature. Out of process tests shouldn't even care that they're testing Java. I don't see what I'm missing
Related Rants
PM: Guys, we have to upgrade Java 8
Me: hey check out all these cool functional programming stuff (lambdas)in Java 8.
PM: Sorry you can't do that. Our automated testing software isn't up to date to test Java 8. So you have to code it "vanilla"
Me: Erm, upgrade it?
PM: we didn't budget it for that.
Me: *thinks to me miself* brilliant
undefined
brilliant