Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
I'd rather have native TypeScript support, better DOM APIs and even better CSS so that we have to do less boilerplate script code for every new project.
-
This, exactly.
If done correctly, it doesnt matter anymore which workflow you use (even if you somehow still use js) and it should feel mostly the same for all the strugglers. -
@fraktalisman Rejoice! CSS nesting is now natively supported ( Currently 72.89% )
-
retoor101081yWebassembly doesn't access the document model right? I think it doesn't target to replace JS.
Btw, some maniac ported OpenTTD (Open Source Transport Tycoon) to webassembly. You can play it in the f-ing browser now. The performance is catshit crazy: https://epicport.com/en/ttd
I think javascript is victim of its own success. -
Which languages do you think would be the top ones to replace JS?
I think it's highly unlikely. Even if all browsers would block all JS - I still see many devs who'd prefer writing their servers with NodeJS -
This is a pretty timid future vision: If WASM took over we'd still have to write JS when using DevTools console.
The bigger vision would be to find a new language that would gain wide native browser support (It's been tried since 2012 though, with Dart) -
@jiraTicket and they could continue writing client code with js (compiled down to wasm).
But that's the point:
It doesn't matter.
I would second dart btw
Or maybe C# or something
Related Rants
Hoping webassembly will replace js eventually.
rant
wk373