@jestdotty Haha.. it was an interesting analogy, jestdotty. I agree with your point: acceptance is important. We are not robots.

I hate that type of friend.. oh, I hate that type. I avoidddd. It's funny because it reminds me of a video or two on YouTube where guys portray that type of friend, like: 'the freeloader': "Dude I'm staaaaarving, what do you have to eat!", the 'always broke guy': "Dude can I like borrow 5 bucks? I'll pay you back tomorrow". And so on.

@Lensflare sudo

@jestdotty Yes, management gave me anxiety as well. I would be working at my desk and whoap, there comes management, probably ready to ask me something stupid! lol

Management becomes quite lazy and is overloaded.

Yes, on topic. Funny, you know, I was thinking the same thing. We should be judged by our fundamentals, not by what we can quickly throw together. Haha, Harry. Yes, yes I do. It is that which I aim to build. I am still building.

Yeah, the social problems make work annoying because you are doing correct work but then some lazy lead dev wipes his ass on effort and decides you should keep reinventing the wheel.

@jestdotty grep `${hope}`

Always suffer... sounds like Nietzsche. There are a number of wrong things that should be reviewed, such as the love thing, as you said. People love to make up excuses for themselves. I understand your frustration. Equally like you, when I turned a love thing into a profession, it quickly became sour. The thing you love is meant to breathe. That reminds me of bosses asking me to go the extra mile just 'because you love the company'. Wtf. lol. No I don't. Yes, that sheep mentality is no fun.

Lmao if you worked hard. That sounds like that movie Coming to America. 20, to, 30 years of hard work and you can afford yourself a place just like this. Lmao. What I noticed in the workplace is that people get ahead especially by connections. I've seen a number of really hard workers and they always got shat on, so I'm not sold on that. It's typical of selfish bosses to offer some crap like food in exchange for something of real value. And then of course, a boss should never yell.

jestdotty's diary. ♥

Get my naame, outta yo damn mouth! :whack:

@jestdotty Hahaha jestdotty, you are a funny one. It's like you're describing a movie, yes. I have yet to watch that movie.

:gasp: jestdotty, I just noticed your desk is so clean!

Didn't know you loved me.

@jestdotty It's good to let out your thoughts.

Writing publicly may indeed need to take on another format.

I would expect people to read well-written blogs. I don't know of this substack thing but lol.

@jestdotty Cheez. It wasn't mush, just excited writing. lol

A.I. slop sucksy.

Internet has gotten very noisy for sure.

@jestdotty $15 * 120 = $1800. Hm, not bad.

A.I. says average: $80-$165/day for rent + $20-$150 for electricity or gas

Hm, late depends on the agreements.

You, you are procastinating! Bad jestdotty! lol. I absolutely love this what you're doing, though. lol

@jestdotty Is that you, legally blonde? jk. Yes, I see the physical point. In that case it is hard to balance. Perhaps some parallelism and clustering could be done, depending on the restaurant, though not entirely realistic.

Yes, indeed, the ordering.

Lmao oven factory. Yes, the internet tubes. They're tubing. I know the analogy. lol

How many ovens do they have? Hm.. yes.. I don't know. 2-12 seems reasonable. 6 ft distance.. mhm. Haha, I like that you are doing the calculation.

30 rounds! Damn. Yeah.. I'm almost certain their pizza-making process is not that streamlined. Most places can get (semi) messy.

So they waste a whole day on one client, and does that warrant the fixed and variable costs?

Fixed costs:

(now I need google lol)

Okay so electricity for instance. A fixed rental price. Not bad. Then of course it can depend based on if the ovens go above a treshold and if there are tresholds.

Let's say a pizza costs $15

@jestdotty Sadly law (and especially insurance) is weighed out through various months and years and is not black and white, but you can add those arguments, depending on the clauses and whichever laws apply. Fault is a difficult one as intent has to be taken into account too.

Is it the modus operandi? I find it hard to believe. Deception is a touchy subject legally.

Yes, advertising is very messed up - the subconscious part in particular. Thankfully some of us don't fall for that.

You're welcome, jestdotty. lol. Yes. Perhaps something else that would not mess.

@jestdotty Psh, jestdotty. I'm not like that. I always state things from myself and if I quote, then I mention the source. In this case the example was from my Law classes back in college, which in turn was from something else. I'm not a copy-paster. lol

That question depends on the business terms. It does not seem unreasonable to allow one client to order that, but I think in that case warnings and systems should be in place (I think it's part of the usability heuristics) to direct the client to the proper form (visibility of system status). Negligence can be different in different cases.

@jestdotty The business would be an unethical one and in that case I don't think they would be granted a license to do business.. hm.

Profit.. well.. hm. Not good, you know? In the theory of Sales: if you mess up for one customer, 9 others will spread the bad word and your business is doomed.

As for the peak, well, we have load-balancing and all the modern cloud cluster stuff these days, no? If they can afford it.

Would you like a pizza while you write this? lol

@jestdotty a bath of oil that laid in some buckets to neutralize the smell of new paint, causing confusion to the other painter right behind them that tripped with them, broke their leg, and so on". A refund? I don't think so. They would probably be in breach of contract, just like in insurance, you are not covered for explicit and purposeful acts of wrongdoing, or sloppy ones.

3. In that case they would need to pull the video feed and see if any customer in the store would be prying the cheese package open, or they would need to trace the whole process back.. and then get authorization from the proper parties to see who did it... and yeah. lol

@jestdotty Yes, it is not the happy flow.

A couple of arguments could follow:

1. When ordering, the customer agreed to the terms and agreed they were aware of the purchase they were making and making every reasonable attempt to guarantee that the order they place is correct. The customer may be at fault. Depending on clauses, the company may also have to guarantee in their QoS programming to conform to reasonable UX so as to prevent accidents. Disclaimer: I'm not a legal expert. lol

2. Law when analyzing fault has to look at acts of egregious (direct) nature. A classic example is: "Who is at fault in the following scenario: The painter enters the customer's house, trips over the patio, falls down the stairs, accidentally rips is lighter into

@Lensflare Can't. They use + and - buttons. I could circumvent that but I don't want to go that far. lmao

@jestdotty Thought like a truly logical person. Well done, jestdotty.

No, at the payment the person will look and then lightbulb, or they might either be too distracted and confirm anyway.

I think they would manage but then they would get extremely busy and I hope they might call the customer. lol. Or is it the customer's responsibility? Hm hm... might be in the Terms.

Interesting business logic, jestdotty.

@jestdotty Is that you, Soul Reaver? It's been thousands of years!

@jestdotty You have a point there. : )

@jestdotty It's a pain. lol

@jestdotty With my didactic skills I will try to teach you its sense:

Think of it like yelling: "Hey! I'm sure this will work!" lmao

Nice to see a true JavaScript lover. lol

Mmmmmmmmmmega Software (ware, ware, ware)

Double Software

It made me crazy when I saw ?? and !! and the concept of 'truthy' and 'falsy'. lmao

Why was it added?

Readings:

https://arahansen.com/what-is-the-e...

Nice to see a fellow passionate frontend dev. :O

Simple things: stays. Complex things: depends how much time I have. lmaoooo.

More concretely: my (math) skills stay when they have been internalized.

@jestdotty I did not mean anything bad by it - it was just my own thinking. I meant that I don't want to adhere to his sloppy practices.

In my specific case, it was an internal toy project, rules were loose (sadly) and I was allowed to make changes, of course, each change had to be PR-approved. I was not the project owner, and so the main dev that created the project did not want me to touch the general structure (trust issue as well) as they maintained the structure themselves. It took them over half a year to get off their ass to bring some structure into it. To clarify: yes, I was not allowed to change the main structure either, though I was allowed to change little things like adding components in their own folders and stuff.

You're not the bad guy at all, jestdotty. You're the good one.

@jestdotty No lol. I keep my integrity.

@Lensflare TypeScript? : D

The issue was the following:

this.element.querySelector('h2')!.textContent = this.project.title;

The project guide set this code up this way (with the exclamation mark, signaling that the element is guaranteed to be found because we were told to place them there).

My mistake was in leaving index.html of project1 v1 tab open while I was supposed to be working on project1 v2's index.html, resulting in the query for h2 on v2 index.html to not find the element and therefore yielding 'property textContent of null undefined'.

@jestdotty Toxic workplaces... no fun.