@ThatDude fair. Time to move.

@PaddiM8 i wish it wasn't man. I wish.

@ctmalloy nope. literally zero shortcuts. it's brutal

@Froot I agree with you. It was more of a joke. Seems like these days I see it implemented everywhere for everything and just makes the code more complex and less readable for zero benefit. It has its place for sure, but recommending that someone use it without a defined purpose and goal is a waste. The recommendation I hear is "you should use DI because loose coupling is totes amazeballs" but no actual proof behind the statement and only contrived examples of where someone would swap out a database and suddenly everything is better because DI was there to save the day. No. I have never seen it used properly for that purpose and neither has it helped make that "easier refactoring" a reality.

@Scrumplex explanation of the joke? you could replace DNS with anything. It's one of those notes where you firmly believe that something isn't the problem until you actually dive in. One should try not to have preconceived notions that are absolutes.

@prashanth that would be "if we've decided to get food, but haven't chosen the kind, it's undefined"

Just a test thought right? Should be fine as long as you don't break all the way in.

@wbunton heh I kinda do the same thing. There are things I always suppress because who the hell cares about file headers.

@jstaiyo hah, it was funny either way. I've never heard that before.

I legit want that

Run. Fast.

Dude. This.

Thanks man! Glad to hear it helped :)

@saberrider I should clarify by saying that my time scale between writing and reviewing code has shifted more towards the latter. I wouldn't be a good architect if I didn't keep up with the community :)

List of reasons: [object Object]

"Hey thanks. By the way, your code looks like it was designed by Jony Ive [kissyface]"

@andersoyvind Voyeurism: works as designed

I'll bet opening that EDMX file is just a constant joy

@FuzzDistor some code for a swift library. Admittedly, I use the midnight color scheme for Xcode so it does look... ominous I guess.

#brogrammer

@codeclod I'm right there with you man. This was a joke for people who put comments when they're completely unnecessary.

//creating an iterator
int i = 0;

This is what it's like developing on Xcode.