@stop You're speculating about what they may or may not later do. I was just stating what they are not doing right now when it was incorrectly suggested by multiple people as a reason for an install failing.

@kwilliams except its not. I had the first insider preview and now current public preview installed on a laptop with secure boot never having been enabled.

"i always felt he had a crush on me and kept my distance"
Quality managering right there.

Nice PSU in that photo but where's the rest of the build?

@electrineer it will be running Arch eventually, I mostly just want to put Windows on there for a bit out of curiosity and see what the video card can do with games before I wipe the drive and it becomes a dedicated work machine.

@Fast-Nop I've disabled secure boot but that shouldn't be a barrier, right? Hm... I'll try anyway but if it's required then it's another dealbreaker reason (aside from the taskbar heresy) that I wouldn't keep Windows 11 installed for long.

@Fast-Nop fTPM is enabled. I just double checked and can see the security module showing up when I boot into the motherboard settings

@stop there is no C:. The drives are totally new and it never even got as far as choosing a drive or partitioning.

https://github.com/search/...

Or less than 1Kb in size

https://github.com/search/...=

C++ projects with less then 10Kb total repository size

"adsl is a thing of the past"
"nbn is a thing of the past" ftfy

*Laughs in 10 gigabit Swedish connection*

The argument that they are just trying to make sure they aren't pairing you with a role which would be a backward step doesn't hold any water for me. You can do the same by asking what salary someone is looking for (which also shouldn't be asked if you can't be open about the salary range on offer first).

@Jilano for .Net development on a Windows machine with a tonne of RAM and beefy CPU, probably.For any other situation, probably not.

At first glance I thought that was an actual keyboard with one of the worst layouts ever :P

I kinda hope this doesn't take off because I can see it ending up like the tapatalk situation where a lot of forums break or have missing functionalities if you aren't using arbitrary third party app and plugin, and you end up with a bunch of tunnel vision users who post crap that looks like crap to anyone without the app or plugin regardless of whether it's supported or not. It's a nice idea (in limited scope as mentioned above, eg no header tags) but I would want this in the official product or not at all.

This kind of thing would get you banned from /r/unixporn

#womenintech

The last time I remember Microsoft giving away anything "for free" it was Windows 10 "upgrades". The skepticism is warranted

Our code is the best. Everyone says it's the best. You know a lot of people say, you know, it's just the greatest. The biggest variables. The most amazing loops. Amazing loops. That's just what I've heard. I mean, I have many friends, many important friends, and they will all tell you the same thing. I've heard it many times. In fact just this morning a very close friend of mine told me just how good our code is, how he and his family are that we are finally bringing dignity back to this great profession of ours. Not like in China where they are coding like dogs and not winning because let me tell you, we are the ones winning. Don't listen to the build errors or fake news unit tests, we have been doing this for many years. Billions and billions and billions of lines of code. Noone does it better than us, let me tell you. When your linter sends its recommendations, it's not sending its best. But when you know the art of the deal like I do, you always win.

Or just removing whitespace.
In the README

Probably the lamest post I've ever seen on here

@electrineer

@linuxxx

4) Telegram clients are open source. No matter how supposedly secure the protocol is from point to point, I would never trust a closed source client any time I really care about security and privacy.

and purely on convenience, I don't need my one single phone connected at all times to be able to access Telegram on my desktop/laptops. That is a huge win for me.

@linuxxx I don't buy that. Signal protocol is more thoroughly tested, yes. And I would back Signal as more secure than Telegram. But as for Whatsapp vs Telegram there are a few points to consider.

1) Whatsapp is end-to-end encrypted by default, yes. But that comes with tradeoffs too. I think Telegram strikes a good balance of convenience vs security. I can have secure messages when I want. You know when it is explicitly end-to-end secured or not. I can access my same messages where I don't care about mission critical security or privacy across multiple devices.

2) I can sign up without a phone number to Telegram. I can't do that with Signal or Whatsapp. That's a huge privacy and anonymity factor before you even get into usage.

3) The major vulnerabilities found in Telegram have been with the clients, not the server or service itself. The same can be said about Whatsapp (e.g. https://theregister.co.uk/2017/03/...)

because your teacher is an AH

Web developer? Or ISIS enthusiast?

If you're paid enough to do what you want in your personal time and don't hate your job, it's not such a bad thing to stay. If you care more about perfecting your craft than feeling like you're at the top of the heap, it sounds like you already know the answer. It's far easier to grow when you're surrounded by people on or above your level.

... and if you're really not the hot shit you seem to think, you'll find out quickly enough :P

@linuxxx No. I mean exactly what I said.

4829
ABCD

Since A is half of B, B must be even. So it must be one of:

1 2 ? ?
2 4 ? ?
3 6 ? ?
4 8 ? ?
0 0 ? ?

Since B and C add up to 10, B cannot possibly be 0. So that only leaves

1 2 8 ?
2 4 6 ?
3 6 4 ?
4 8 2 ?

If we fill out (D = B + 1) we get 4 possible combinations:

1 2 8 3
2 4 6 5
3 6 4 7
4 8 2 9

Add each set to get:

1 + 2 + 8 + 3 = 14
2 + 4 + 6 + 5 = 17
3 + 6 + 4 + 7 = 20
4 + 8 + 2 + 9 = 23

Telegram is better in pretty much every conceivable way other than lacking video calls.