@cafecortado that's freaking beautiful. Wish I was even a bit so creative

@jestdotty see his post!

@Lensflare damn, that's why I rarely sleep. It's just nog needed! I'm an AI, yEEAaaah

@devRancid yes, in upvotes statistics they're counted. They lower the upvote sum with one or two points each. Other option is not to take negative upvoted in sum at all. Don't know which better

High quality statistics image here: https://devrant.molodetz.nl/

Ah, here are the stats of many people! I made an automerger! In future this will be a one post rant.

Edit: ah fuck, dR fucks up quality. I fucking spent 15 minutes on it! Time lost

@Tounai as I once stated before :P (No offence), you're obviously a much news reader. The fact that they come with an airplane, It's not an issue at all in perspective. Only a stupid journalist would fall over that. There's so much more interesting to tell. But yh, this is what we get. A huge subject parsed in a small article with 50% unimportant and critics given on some relatively unimportant part.

But 100% agree on the nuclear power thingies. That's something that guaranteed works and is future proof. Windmills will be replaced with new tech frequently probably. Not really future proof. There are much steps to be done in green energy, that's why i don't vouch for it yet - the storage issue has to be resolved before taken seriously. I think we need a complete different type of battery, other materials or so. There is more cobalt, we just didn't search yet is the word

@Lensflare not since marquee was invented. It still works btw!

@12bitfloat sometimes ten women can't create a baby. That's sad too

@Lensflare this is all content for training of my new bot soon. Waiting for new hardware. Someone already created a simple recurrent neural network based on users. You give username, and it will generate a rant like that user. I don't expect it to be very good - my AoK bot was RNN. RNN only is not enough to simulate someone

If i would use the @kiki's export tool as source, I'm able to make a realistic devrant user clone. But need some RAM! :)

The personalized stats are getting nice (see of jestdotty and me) since there is more data

@jestdotty

@feuerherz

Highest score, the title of graph is wrong (I hope :D)

My own personalized stat

Most ignored

Rants per hour

Rants per day

Comments per weekday

Comments per hour

Hugbit. Bithug (not bad name fir a dev site. Hmm)

Damn, is the domain free?

@Grumm my German is good enough to understand it

@vlord I do respect this, but you've let it done too much. It's barely your voice anymore. How can't you notice it? I even doubt if it was a self written text ever based on how very GPT it is.

Edit: I say no. Not ten percent is even based on smth self written. This is pure GPT, I'm sure

@jestdotty why was it a bad idea?

@donkulator I'm always worried that people don't recognize the gpt texts but so far, on this forum, nobody falls for it. Imagine being so stupid to write a post like this. Especially on a platform full of people who are good with recognizing structures / patterns

Why the Pdf enthousiasts?

It has many users already. I'm always amazed how people get those first ones. Reddit used bots for initial content / give idea of activity. All those platforms are not made with love like devrant is. Also, a general purpose forum is lame - you need a subject right. Do you really want to spam about what you've read in the news like everyone else? Also, why would x need an alternative? It works fine for people into that stuff. Oh no, the owner is for free speech, people are so bad, it will be only racism now! Ofc not, people are better than that in reality. You're an arrogant basterd to think people need to be corrected according to your standards. Take devrant, not moderated and doesn't get out of control at all! Living example

@Lensflare when you're over 21 one and then still you need written permission by your parents to be allowed to watch such thing

@kobenz geany is amazing. The app that always works. You can feel the decency while using it. There is a version with terminal in it and without. Cool to remember me about it, I'll check if smth is new

That's very sad, the developer that made that new it and was juist lazy and ofc, all test people click perfectly on the button and a project manager won't want to see a few hours extra wasted on it because it just works. Yes, - working on it a second times cost way more time than doing it right in first place. So fuck that dev, he did not even try it. Pure lazy in unique form