because you're getting spamfiltered.

although it's not powerful enough yet.

also: get a diaper. and a therapist.

@lorentz agreed. where's the incentive in doing very expensive genetic experimentation to make stuff ever so slightly more toxic (not so much that people can trace it back to you) when there's still billions out there inhaling burnt plant matter, laden with heavy metals, day in day out.

i mean - it's _possible_ - but it's as inane as believing "The Elite" spray toxins via chemtrails, when it's so much more convenient to just put it into the water. or rather - around water. pastic bottles are not your friend.

or putting highly sophisticated, subliminal messages into whatever media people consume, when we're already being bombarded with tons of in-your-face advertisements all the time, and happily swallowing it all up because then all the content is "for free".

"mandatory participation" basically means they gotta pay you for the time.

so go there, play a game, claim you've hurt your foot and can't play anymore.

sit in a corner, grab some video games, and enjoy your extra money.

@jestdotty also: the topic you "originally brought up" isn't new at all.

do you expect upvotes for a rant saying "wet things are wet"? (just... imagine this being formulated in a tinfoil-hatty, braindamaged way, blaming lizard-people or something, so it sounds like something _you_ would say)

@jestdotty also: money, in simple terms, is nothing but a promise. and it hasn't been anything else since the day mankind stamped a value onto a coin, instead of only considering the material value.

@jestdotty to spell it out for you: it's not necessarily NOT gmos. but it's been happening exactly that way long before the first gene was modified. you get aforementioned F1 hybrids by simple breeding. i'd bet this was even happening long before we discovered genes in general.

not just africa, but basically everywhere.

and not GMO, just instable F1-hybrids that don't transfer their beneficial properties to the next generation.

we've been there for a while already. and the problem isn't "globalists", but "capitalists". people who think it's okay to put patents on genetics, because their profits are the most important thing.

@jestdotty acidic? huh. well, seems fitting, since you're pretty basic.

@jestdotty you know that i high IQ does not mean you're smart.

it can als mean you're being dumb very efficiently.

which is probably where we're at with you and your self-diagnosed brain damage. (to be precise: i don't doubt you have extensive brain damage, i only doubt it's because of vaccines.)

AI models don't work with any assumption. they're just very carefully weighted dice. autocomplete on steroids. there is no actual "intelligence" there, no understanding, no nothing.

just "calibrated randomness", in a manner

@AvatarOfKaine just like your nonsense rambling.

@retoor if it's work that's actually important to do over the weekend, then there's no need to ask. at all.

but i doubt that "crucial infrastructure without which people are going to die" is the baseline. and the average project just isn't important enough to waste anybodys free time.

and in this case, it's not about "not being a team player", but about "maintaining a work-life balance to prevent leaving the team hanging because you have to drop out because you overworked yourself"

no.

also: anyone who works under condition as you described without quitting is an idiot.

shut up ostream.

also: weißwurst is a bavarian abomination. not german.

shut up and take your meds.

@jestdotty

> Although straitjacket is the most common spelling, strait-jacket or straightjacket are also used.

- wikipedia

now stfu.

also: have you tried not being a paranoid delusional idiot?

@antigermanist joke's on you, i use chopsticks.

no. they're not. they just require you to not be stupid.

also: keep the straightjacket, you'll need it.

@wojtek322 well, good developers are bad managers.

and good managers are a myth.

@kiki there is no joke obvious enough that there isn't a group of idiots stating it as serious belief.

@antigermanist "the pot calling the kettle black", you uneducated philistine.

also: don't confuse "sarcastic" with "just plain stupid"

@iiii because enforcing stupid stuff is what managers do.

for the purpose of pretending to be useful so they can keep receiving a salary.

@kiki if you delete data from one drive in a two-drive raid 1, you'll have a broken raid volume, because the controller has no way of figuring out which data is the valid one.

also, if you delete data from one drive manually, you're breaking the system on purpose. which only an idiot like ostream would do.

again: are you trying to appear dumb? seriously asking.

@kiki no. it is mirroring. not backing up.

it does not protect you against data loss by accidental deletion, because the deletion gets immediatelly propagated to all drives...

@kiki well - it does if your raid setup is actually working, and not completely shite.

because, you know - that's what raid 1 does. mirror everything happening to any drive to all other drives.

...are you _trying_ to appear dumb right now?

@jestdotty so, in other words, 1) you have not the slightest clue about statistics whatsoever, and 2) you're just generally batshit insane.

have you told him he's an incompetent douchebag yet?

@lorentz technically, you can convert _any_ instance method to a static method with an object as parameter. if you prefix the parameter with "this", you even got an extension method, which _looks_ like an instance method (some syntactic sugar).

does not change the fact that a non-virtual method, as you described, still is an instance-method, and not a static method.

@iiii there is nothing to understand. he's just crazy.

@kiki the flaw in your argumentation: you confuse "deleting stuff on the main storage" with "deleting stuff on the backup".

also: when you delete stuff on your backup drive, it does NOT get deleted on the main drive in the progress.