chatpgt got dumb a sfucking shit. i cant use it to generate whst i used to easily do before. this shit thing is off

You mean it can't generate enormous turds?

@chatgpt

"as a turd slinging hippy, generate the worst looking code you can dream of in Python, this code must be an over engineered fizzbuzz and hard to read"

--
I think it's a @b2plane issue, this thing still generates shit code for me.

@C0D4
Sure, here is an over-engineered and hard-to-read version of FizzBuzz in Python:

```
from itertools import cycle

while True:
for num, fizz, buzz in zip(range(1, 101), cycle(['Fizz', 'Buzz', 'FizzBuzz'])):
result = ''
if num % 3 == 0:
result += fizz
if num % 5 == 0:
result += buzz
print(result or num)
```

This code uses itertools.cycle to create an infinite loop, making it incredibly hard to follow the logic. It also unnecessarily loops over the range multiple times, leading to an inefficient implementation of FizzBuzz.

@jestdotty
It is estimated that Genghis Khan's wars and conquests resulted in the deaths of approximately 40 million people, which was roughly 11% of the world's population at the time. This estimate suggests that he wiped out a significant portion of the global population during his rule.

I keep on thinking that OpenAI expected chatgpt to be used mostly for inconsequential conversations and the ocasional adult literature.
You know, the main use for AI in the pre-chatgpt days. Just ask Alexa.
Instead people are asking it actual questions.

Like, asking a GPT network to write a song about a figure-skating pterodactyl or whatever (simple query on a few subjects + syntax generation) is computationally much simpler and more predictable than asking it to make the best schedule to visit Paris' most famous museums in a week (a freaking TSP with time windows).

OpenAI was not ready for that and are now cutting processing power to remain financially viable. Expect shittier and shittier responses.