Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@irene is it though? I know that's what we traditionally think of as a bug, but as a question of knowing, isnt any mistake in programming/architecture just that: a mistake? And then any unforseen issues with the underlying dependecies or software should be cosidered a bug?
Stackoverflow.
Recently made an account on Instagram.
Uploaded two pics
Deleted both of them
Now I've -2 posts
Is it possible to have an "epistemological bug crisis"? Because i feel like everything I referred to as bugs in my early career weren't true bugs, they were just bad programming or architecture flaws. I feel like real "bugs" are weird issues with the language, compiler, module, etc... that should work one way but work another way. Anyone else had that experience?
This gives rise to the secondary question: who perpetuates the idea that bugs are just "anything wrong with the current codebase"?
rant
existential crisis
questioning existence
bugs
bug