@root I would date you in real life

🍿

oh no, love confessions on devRant, truly variety content we get here

I'd pick @rutee07 of course (more psycho).

Not with that name you wouldn't

@sudo hi 😜

Damn user not active... #foreveralone

Ok how about @nouser

Simping on a devRant avatar. Damn.

God damnit!

Do I know you?
🤔

Really though, I don't date guys.
I've tried many times, and it turns out I'm not straight. The more you know 🌠

@SortOfTested My exact thoughts 🦅

Dude, for all you know root could actually be a 70 year old retired priest pretending to be a hot lesbian.

@Frederick Yes.

@AlmondSauce No; 350lb black truck driver named Bubba. ⛟

@Jilano I just woke up and I'm blushing, see what you do to me 😊

@Frederick, @Root is the whole package deal, some would walk away in fear, others take the challenge head on like @Rantbook here.

@Frederick it was inevitable, I'm surprised it took this long more then anything.

I wonder if we can monetise devDating with a hot desk session.

@C0D4 😂
Gives "hotdesking" a whole new meaning.

@Frederick
devDating? Is that what we settled on? When I went to sleep the options were still devMingle and devDTF

@Frederick
Are you suggesting @Root's chocolatey goodness might not be the Han Solo to OP's Rando Calrissian?

#TruthInAdvertising

@Frederick Well, opposites attract 😏

@Frederick There is smartness in everything (except in the WordPress codebase) 🥳

Let's see just how much opposites attract, with this hot steamy desk!

For our first contestants we have the silent stalker, the Android dev from behind the shadows, @Rantbook!

Now, @Rantbook has had he's eyes on our first match for a while now, she's a glamour, she's the man eater of dreams, and she's behind curtain number 1.... @Root!

Now our contestants must... oh... oh hold on... they are already on the hotdesk... and ... oh my... wait that's a position?

Well be back after this commercial break!

Well, that got interesting 😜

What the flying fuck.

By matching the worst possible people we can easily keep the general dissatisfaction flowing, which keeps the platform alive.

🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

@Root I'd love a platonic dinner date with you -- but only to watch you get stupid drunk on rum, after which you try to convince me that this silly Ruby language has merit... 🙃

"Noooo EVERYTHING IS AN EXPRESSHION *hic*. The universe is an expression... Rum... Drinking Rum is not a statement. Rum is.. rum is a succsinct expresssion!"

@bittersweet
Is there a way to unit test being drunk in Ruby?

@SortOfTested

expect(@root).to(receive(:drink).at_least(3).times.with(:rum))
expect(@root).to be_talkative
expect(@root).to giggle

🍹

OMG, I cringed so hard.

@Root Is this legitimate Ruby syntax?

@Lor-inc It's in RSpec's DSL (a testing gem), but yes it's perfectly valid (if you define the `be_talkative` and `giggle` matchers). 😊 Even the @root (an instance var).

@10Dev A month?

Try sudo I would date @root in real life

@99thdev That still only describes his opinion, so it doesn't affect me or my behavior.

Now `sudo date me @root` will get his permissions revoked immediately.

Wtf happened here

@uyouthe It was a feelings massacre.