Why moment.js ? Whyyy?

Backwards compatibility? Forward compatibility?

@gronostaj as far as I know it’s not directly exposed in their api but only being used internally, however you’re right it’s probably a placeholder for future implementation.

Still funny tho. I would add a TODO or something at least

Reminds me of mootools aliasing functions because they misspelled their names.
But it was released so long ago, they couldn't just rename it.

@gronostaj Sideways compatibility?

@PonySlaystation Like, with parallel branch? ;)

JS devs being JS devs.

I'm starting to think this is miles ahead of the league these days.

https://www.npmjs.com/package/lpad

I talked about moment.js with a colleague the other day. It's causing a lot of performance issues in our codebase. Considering swapping it out for day.js, or even just plain old Date

Ah yes, string oof = preParseFormat(oof);

@ScriptCoded We’re having same issues and I’m doing this exactly atm. I’m trying to replace it with good old native Date.

Wait a minute

FUCKINNNNGG HA! AND THAT PIECE OF SHIT IS HUUUUGE. For what???? For parsing time??????? Fucking hilarious.

What a fucking piece of shit library this is.

Thank you for demonstrating it. Idiot devs like these ruin the js ecosystem.

@ScriptCoded Can recommend, switched to date-fns myself

I also saw some of those alternatives, but then again Angular Material supports moment 🙄

I can’t stand material as a design or angular as a framework so those two words together give me instant anxiety 😅😂

@FastFwd00 mind elaborate? I find angular pretty good, consistent and not big learning curve.

@WorstVarNames not really. It’s just my subjective opinion. I prefer React and I think material looks ugly

Prob a placeholder?

Identity function right there!