Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
This cries for a silly joke but i am to uninspired atm.
@electrineer plz do your job. -
@thebiochemic @neriald good idea
-
@electrineer too verbose 😅
-
@Lensflare two words
-
@electrineer you were supposed to make a joke 😄
-
@Lensflare couldn't come up with any. I should've also read the end of the rant and offered "reduce repetition in type X"
-
@electrineer it’s not repetition IN the type. It’s the type itself that is repeated in different namespaces :)
But good idea -
@Lensflare well then I misunderstood "dried type X" even though I knew what it meant
I am Computer Science Student
Yesterday I asked question to my classmates, what is Linux,
here's some(non-fo...
A possibile interview answer
Exactly 😂😂
Do you think it’s appropriate to use the phrase "dried" in commit messages to refer to removing duplicate code? (DRY = don’t repeat yourself)
I just used it and I’m not sure if it’s ok because some devs might not understand it and the the original letters from DRY went away and became "dried" so it might be even more cryptic.
On the other hand it’s so much more concise having "dried type X" compared to "refactored the code so that it doesn’t contain duplicates of type X"
question
dried
dry