Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
This is just a general course of nature. Trying to reinvent the wheel may result in a better wheel, but it will take several attempts.
I don't see a problem with this, people should strive to make things better if they think it's inferior. Whether people will agree with them is in their own hands to decide.
When you have something in your clipboard but then press Ctrl+C instead of Ctrl+V and end up with a blank line...
😑
Avast. :/
so... is ReScript just a bunch of butthurt javascript developers who couldn't hack it to learn TypeScript (older, better tooling, better community, massive support with library typings, etc.)
seems like just a lot of extra, seemingly pointless and useless differentiating syntax rules
why do we need to keep reinventing the wheel?
"Our type system is guaranteed to *never* be wrong."
seen statements like this way too many times in my career... welcome to programming pain world, i should just read the rescript issues on github just to get a laugh here
but again, just a 🤡 giving his two cents
update: confirmed, all i've found on the web is rescript shillers trying REALLY HARD to defend it, and mostly failing
rant
what
why
clownscript
rescript
clown
🤡
sigh