That was a nice ransomware

Also dfox and trogus have gone missing.

Everybody says that the first day

Nah, I bet Unity lost the gamedevs forever

@Lensflare yes, when I want to watch some dev related video I open them in incognito because I don't want them to fuck up my perfect cat videos algorithm

@mostr4am a lot of cars, you probably wouldn't like it lol. But it has a decent public transport.

Coruña? I lived there for a couple of years.

Where is that?

Fullest stack

But do you own the land or just the mortgages? XD

Hi, who are you?

Break inside switch statements are just boilerplate code and a source of bugs when you forget them. I'm glad that new languages don't support them.

@b2plane by any chance do you have something to do with this? XD

‘It’s okay to poo at work’: Australian health department praised for tackling taboo with humorous campaign
https://theguardian.com/australia-n...

@AmyShackles the trap with those 4 scenarios is that they don't occur the same number of times. Instead, the 1st and 2nd *combined* ocurr 1/3 of the time (because you only pick A 1/3 of the time) , the 3rd ocurrs other 1/3 of the time and the 4th the other 1/3 of the time. So considering this, at the end you will get 2/3 of switching.

@retoor I don't know, too much thinking for a Sunday 🙃

@retoor yep, but I guess that by making door_first_choice dependant on door_showman_choice, instead the opposite, you are getting the distribution of probabilities wrong or something

@retoor I was going to volunteer as the Java male programmer but nah, the world will be better without Java

I think the way you are doing it is fucking up the probabilities somehow because half of the time (instead of a third) the first choice door equals the prize door.

I am playing with it and it seems that if I put the order right (i.e. first choose the prize, then the first choice and then the showman choice) I get that switch always wins. Because that way those whiles and ifs have a different logic (the correct one?).

That's because images don't work on devRant again

I remember doing a simulation too some time ago and I got the canonical 67%/33% result.
I'll take a look at your code later, I'm curious.

It was just one of the 50 jobs or so I applied to when I was unemployed. I liked that it was just one interview and that's it, meanwhile other companies required 3 or 4 interviews and a technical test or similar shit.

@localpost kanyewest is its own wing

@jestdotty I tend to repress anger most of the time but then explode suddenly when nobody expects

@jestdotty it's already happening it seems: https://devrant.com/rants/11235107/...

You tried to sting everybody but it isn't working as you expected. So maybe you should go back to being nice.

Congrats! Welcome to Engineer Therapy.

Meh, it opened in nano a file that doesn't exist anymore.

@donkulator for version control, probably

@jestdotty you can post the meme in ascii art