@undefined - my definition of commercial is "used to deploy products or is otherwise maintained on a large scale by the company's IT department".

I know there are developers and admins that user Arch as their daily driver, but unless IT deploys production servers running Arch, or offers Arch as a supported OS on company's laptops, I don't consider it "commercial use". I don't know specifically of anyone that fits the bill, but I won't be surprised if you can point to one or two. Still, one or two deployments in the world counts as "no one" for most intents and purposes.

Yea... What are you trying to say?

@byisk, I like the concept of GOG, but they dropped the ball on Linux integration - on an up to date OS their games rarely run out of the box (I'm playing their EotB distribution) and it relies on old versions of libraries that are not packaged with the game and no longer exist on my system. Compare with Steam that also relies on ancient circa-2012 software setup, but at least that package the whole "runtime stack" with their client.

Which brings me to GOG galaxy, which still isn't available for Linux, more than 2 years after they promised a cross platform client.

I prefer Steam, humble or buying from indi producers directly.

@aki237 , which is basically what @drRoss said...

If you want to learn Linux, make because you want some devops, then get one of the 3 major OSes: Ubuntu, Fedora or SuSE. Then when you're comfortable with that, maybe try Arch or some such.

If you just want a stable and pretty OS to develop on maybe look at Elementary.

I'm with you - I will not reboot to play a game anymore.

I prefer cubicles, especially if it's the two people per cubicle variant. It's much easier to switch between collaboration and drilling down some code by yourself.

You didn't fail - Microsoft failed you.

Yes, eclipse seems to be the common denominator :-)

It's the "Microsoft GB" - like a real GB only actual size depends is kind of random, and your system appears to have mostly small ones...