Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
After further inspection it looks like the bastard son of a JSON. It looks like every field is made like this
<type>:<length?>:<value>;
Where <type> can seemingly be either
- a: object
- s: string
- i: integer
<length>, for an object, means how many key-value pairs it contains, whereas for a string it means the amount of characters; the integer field doesn't use this value at all
<value> is, of course, value
I know this is being used by some PHP application, but honestly I can't figure out if this structure comes from a library or it's custom code. -
davide24243yI think "a" states for "array" not "object". In any case I don't think is a widespread format. Maybe a proprietary one?
-
@davide it would stand to reason that "a" means array... but that's very clearly a dictionary. The amount of values it holds is 4, not 8, and that means it's working with key-value pairs
-
C0D4669443y@IntrusionCM beat me to it.
@IHateForALiving
if it's php this would make sense, just unserialize() and it will go back to an array.
If it's not php, Welp. Good luck. -
@C0D4 I think it's a neat, nice and lean format.
Types are included and it's pretty straightforward.
Best: It's not XML or untyped as in JSON. -
Well, the owner of this site is unserializing my user input.
And oh, such bad practice does, it does,
demand, that I... be naughty
Related Rants
Does anybody here recognize such a weird data format? I've never seen anything like this
rant
question